↓ Skip to main content

Social signals of safety and risk confer utility and have asymmetric effects on observers' choices

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
30 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social signals of safety and risk confer utility and have asymmetric effects on observers' choices
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/nn.4022
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongil Chung, George I Christopoulos, Brooks King-Casas, Sheryl B Ball, Pearl H Chiu

Abstract

Individuals' risk attitudes are known to guide choices about uncertain options. However, in the presence of others' decisions, these choices can be swayed and manifest as riskier or safer behavior than one would express alone. To test the mechanisms underlying effective social 'nudges' in human decision-making, we used functional neuroimaging and a task in which participants made choices about gambles alone and after observing others' selections. Against three alternative explanations, we found that observing others' choices of gambles increased the subjective value (utility) of those gambles for the observer. This 'other-conferred utility' was encoded in ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and these neural signals predicted conformity. We further identified a parametric interaction with individual risk preferences in anterior cingulate cortex and insula. These data provide a neuromechanistic account of how information from others is integrated with individual preferences that may explain preference-congruent susceptibility to social signals of safety and risk.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 204 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 69 33%
Researcher 36 17%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Master 18 9%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 18 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 94 45%
Neuroscience 31 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 8%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 30 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 137. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#178,645
of 17,970,704 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#402
of 4,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,588
of 240,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#11
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,970,704 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,787 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.