↓ Skip to main content

Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000273.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

David J Henderson-Smart, Peter A Steer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 95 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 18%
Student > Master 15 15%
Other 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Unspecified 12 12%
Other 30 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 52%
Unspecified 18 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 14 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2016.
All research outputs
#2,852,225
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,911
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,270
of 231,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.