You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Caffeine versus theophylline for apnea in preterm infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000273.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J Henderson‐Smart, Peter A Steer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Researcher | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 12% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 41 | 21% |
| Unknown | 50 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 56 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2023.
All research outputs
#4,331,161
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,635
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,541
of 172,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#40
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.