The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevenção e manejo não farmacológico da dor no recém-nascido
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/0034-7167.2015680118p |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giordana de Cássia Pinheiro da Motta, Maria Luzia Chollopetz da Cunha |
| Abstract |
to describe the main non-pharmacological interventions for pain relief in newborns available in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. an exploratory search of the MedLine, Lilacs and Scielo online databases was conducted to retrieve references of studies published from 2004 to 2013. several non-pharmacological interventions were shown to be effective, to represent low risk for neonates and to have a low operational cost. The ones most often discussed in the literature were: oral administration of glucose/sucrose, non-nutritive sucking, breastfeeding, skin-to-skin contact, facilitated tucking and swaddling. healthcare teams should be familiar with these methods and use them more effectively in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit daily routines, so as to ensure that newborns receive qualified and more human care. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 164 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
| Researcher | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 66 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 19% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#560
of 738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#309,259
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.