↓ Skip to main content

Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
15 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
251 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
237 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants
Published in
Nature Plants, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng Cheng, Jian Wu, Xu Cai, Jianli Liang, Michael Freeling, Xiaowu Wang

Abstract

All natural plant species are evolved from ancient polyploids. Polyloidization plays an important role in plant genome evolution, species divergence and crop domestication. We review how the pattern of polyploidy within the plant phylogenetic tree has engendered hypotheses involving mass extinctions, lag-times following polyploidy, and epochs of asexuality. Polyploidization has happened repeatedly in plant evolution and, we conclude, is important for crop domestication. Once duplicated, the effect of purifying selection on any one duplicated gene is relaxed, permitting duplicate gene and regulatory element loss (fractionation). We review the general topic of fractionation, and how some gene categories are retained more than others. Several explanations, including neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization and gene product dosage balance, have been shown to influence gene content over time. For allopolyploids, genetic differences between parental lines immediately manifest as subgenome dominance in the wide-hybrid, and persist and propagate for tens of millions of years. While epigenetic modifications are certainly involved in genome dominance, it has been difficult to determine which came first, the chromatin marks being measured or gene expression. Data support the conclusion that genome dominance and heterosis are antagonistic and mechanically entangled; both happen immediately in the synthetic wide-cross hybrid. Also operating in this hybrid are mechanisms of 'paralogue interference'. We present a foundation model to explain gene expression and vigour in a wide hybrid/new allotetraploid. This Review concludes that some mechanisms operate immediately at the wide-hybrid, and other mechanisms begin their operations later. Direct interaction of new paralogous genes, as measured using high-resolution chromatin conformation capture, should inform future research and single cell transcriptome sequencing should help achieve specificity while studying gene sub- and neo-functionalization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 237 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 47 20%
Researcher 37 16%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Bachelor 23 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 60 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 94 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 56 24%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Environmental Science 3 1%
Chemistry 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 67 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,745,787
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#878
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,083
of 339,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#18
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.