↓ Skip to main content

Risk of re-identification of epigenetic methylation data: a more nuanced response is needed

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epigenetics, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risk of re-identification of epigenetic methylation data: a more nuanced response is needed
Published in
Clinical Epigenetics, April 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13148-015-0079-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yann Joly, Stephanie OM Dyke, Warren A Cheung, Mark A Rothstein, Tomi Pastinen

Abstract

In this letter to the editor, we respond to the recent publication by Philibert et al. Methylation array data can simultaneously identify individuals and convey protected health information: an unrecognized ethical concern (Clinical Epigenetics 2014, 6:28). Further discussion of the issues raised by the risk of re-identification of epigenetic methylation data is needed, and a more nuanced approach should be taken with respect to its implications for data sharing policy than the one provided.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Master 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 23%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Computer Science 1 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,273,512
of 22,805,349 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epigenetics
#1,109
of 1,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,832
of 265,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epigenetics
#39
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,805,349 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.