↓ Skip to main content

Support for midlife anxiety diagnosis as an independent risk factor for dementia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 15,567)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
85 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
54 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Support for midlife anxiety diagnosis as an independent risk factor for dementia: a systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2018
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019399
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Gimson, Marco Schlosser, Jonathan D Huntley, Natalie L Marchant

Abstract

Anxiety is an increasingly recognised predictor of cognitive deterioration in older adults and in those with mild cognitive impairment. Often believed to be a prodromal feature of neurodegenerative disease, anxiety may also be an independent risk factor for dementia, operationally defined here as preceding dementia diagnosis by ≥10 years. A systematic review of the literature on anxiety diagnosis and long-term risk for dementia was performed following published guidelines. Medline, PsycINFO and Embase were searched for peer-reviewed journals until 8 March 2017. Publications reporting HR/OR for all-cause dementia based on clinical criteria from prospective cohort or case-control studies were selected. Included studies measured clinically significant anxiety in isolation or after controlling for symptoms of depression, and reported a mean interval between anxiety assessment and dementia diagnosis of at least 10 years. Methodological quality assessments were performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. HR/OR for all-cause dementia. Searches yielded 3510 articles, of which 4 (0.02%) were eligible. The studies had a combined sample size of 29 819, and all studies found a positive association between clinically significant anxiety and future dementia. Due to the heterogeneity between studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted. Clinically significant anxiety in midlife was associated with an increased risk of dementia over an interval of at least 10 years. These findings indicate that anxiety may be a risk factor for late-life dementia, excluding anxiety that is related to prodromal cognitive decline. With increasing focus on identifying modifiable risk factors for dementia, more high-quality prospective studies are required to clarify whether clinical anxiety is a risk factor for dementia, separate from a prodromal symptom.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 17%
Student > Master 13 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 28 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 727. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2020.
All research outputs
#12,994
of 16,612,921 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#38
of 15,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#472
of 281,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#3
of 614 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,612,921 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 614 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.