↓ Skip to main content

A study of a culturally focused psychiatric consultation service for Asian American and Latino American primary care patients with depression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A study of a culturally focused psychiatric consultation service for Asian American and Latino American primary care patients with depression
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-11-166
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nhi-Ha T Trinh, C A Bedoya, Trina E Chang, Katherine Flaherty, Maurizio Fava, Albert Yeung

Abstract

Ethnic minorities with depression are more likely to seek mental health care through primary care providers (PCPs) than mental health specialists. However, both provider and patient-specific challenges exist. PCP-specific challenges include unfamiliarity with depressive symptom profiles in diverse patient populations, limited time to address mental health, and limited referral options for mental health care. Patient-specific challenges include stigma around mental health issues and reluctance to seek mental health treatment. To address these issues, we implemented a multi-component intervention for Asian American and Latino American primary care patients with depression at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 142 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 17%
Social Sciences 13 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2011.
All research outputs
#7,166,280
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,354
of 4,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,342
of 135,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#13
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.