↓ Skip to main content

Association between parenting practices and children's dietary intake, activity behavior and development of body mass index: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
298 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between parenting practices and children's dietary intake, activity behavior and development of body mass index: the KOALA Birth Cohort Study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-8-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica S Gubbels, Stef PJ Kremers, Annette Stafleu, Sanne I de Vries, R Alexandra Goldbohm, Pieter C Dagnelie, Nanne K de Vries, Stef van Buuren, Carel Thijs

Abstract

Insights into the effects of energy balance-related parenting practices on children's diet and activity behavior at an early age is warranted to determine which practices should be recommended and to whom. The purpose of this study was to examine child and parent background correlates of energy balance-related parenting practices at age 5, as well as the associations of these practices with children's diet, activity behavior, and body mass index (BMI) development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 298 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 287 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 12%
Researcher 29 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 45 15%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Psychology 25 8%
Social Sciences 23 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 6%
Other 39 13%
Unknown 92 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2015.
All research outputs
#14,137,641
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,717
of 1,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,326
of 108,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.