↓ Skip to main content

Vitamin E for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vitamin E for neuroleptic-induced tardive dyskinesia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000209.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karla Soares-Weiser, Nicola Maayan, John McGrath

Abstract

Antipsychotic (neuroleptic) medication is used extensively to treat people with chronic mental illnesses. Its use, however, is associated with adverse effects, including movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia (TD) - a problem often seen as repetitive involuntary movements around the mouth and face. Vitamin E has been proposed as a treatment to prevent or decrease TD.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 69 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Other 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 16 23%
Unknown 10 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 31%
Psychology 11 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2017.
All research outputs
#2,764,959
of 15,065,346 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,491
of 11,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,041
of 103,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#31
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,065,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.