↓ Skip to main content

Group-based parent-training programmes for improving emotional and behavioural adjustment in children from birth to three years old

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
157 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
260 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Group-based parent-training programmes for improving emotional and behavioural adjustment in children from birth to three years old
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003680.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barlow, Jane, Smailagic, Nadja, Ferriter, Michael, Bennett, Cathy, Jones, Hannah

Abstract

Emotional and behavioural problems in children are common. Research suggests that parenting has an important role to play in helping children to become well-adjusted, and that the first few months and years are especially important. Parenting programmes may have a role to play in improving the emotional and behavioural adjustment of infants and toddlers. This review is applicable to parents and carers of children up to three years eleven months although some studies included children up to five years old. To:a) establish whether group-based parenting programmes are effective in improving the emotional and behavioural adjustment of children three years of age or less (i.e. maximum mean age of 3 years 11 months); b) assess the role of parenting programmes in the primary prevention of emotional and behavioural problems. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Sociofile, Social Science Citation Index, ASSIA, National Research Register (NRR) and ERIC. The searches were originally run in 2000 and then updated in 2007/8. Randomised controlled trials of group-based parenting programmes that had used at least one standardised instrument to measure emotional and behavioural adjustment. The results for each outcome in each study have been presented, with 95% confidence intervals. Where appropriate the results have been combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Eight studies were included in the review. There were sufficient data from six studies to combine the results in a meta-analysis for parent-reports and from three studies to combine the results for independent assessments of children's behaviour post-intervention. There was in addition, sufficient information from three studies to conduct a meta-analysis of both parent-report and independent follow-up data. Both parent-report (SMD -0.25; CI -0.45 to -0.06), and independent observations (SMD -0.54; CI -0.84 to -0.23) of children's behaviour produce significant results favouring the intervention group post-intervention. A meta-analysis of follow-up data indicates a significant result favouring the intervention group for parent-reports (SMD -0.28; CI -0.51 to -0.04) but a non-significant result favouring the intervention group for independent observations (SMD -0.19; CI -0.42, 0.05). The findings of this review provide some support for the use of group-based parenting programmes to improve the emotional and behavioural adjustment of children with a maximum mean age of three years eleven months. There is, insufficient evidence to reach firm conclusions regarding the role that such programmes might play in the primary prevention of such problems. There are also limited data available concerning the long-term effectiveness of these programmes. Further research is needed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 252 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 18%
Researcher 40 15%
Student > Master 29 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 66 25%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 22%
Social Sciences 36 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 52 20%