↓ Skip to main content

SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
178 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-12-398
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan Teyra, Sergey A Samsonov, Sven Schreiber, M Teresa Pisabarro

Abstract

Protein interactions are essential for coordinating cellular functions. Proteomic studies have already elucidated a huge amount of protein-protein interactions that require detailed functional analysis. Understanding the structural basis of each individual interaction through their structural determination is necessary, yet an unfeasible task. Therefore, computational tools able to predict protein binding regions and recognition modes are required to rationalize putative molecular functions for proteins. With this aim, we previously created SCOWLP, a structural classification of protein binding regions at protein family level, based on the information obtained from high-resolution 3D protein-protein and protein-peptide complexes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 165 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 23%
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Master 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 19%
Computer Science 27 15%
Chemistry 10 6%
Engineering 8 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 18 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#1,929,136
of 5,038,248 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#1,379
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,228
of 69,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#29
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,038,248 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 60th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.