↓ Skip to main content

Scientific production on workplace bullying/harassment in dissertations and theses in the Brazilian scenario

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 221)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific production on workplace bullying/harassment in dissertations and theses in the Brazilian scenario
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, April 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420150000200012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isabelle Cristinne Pinto Costa, Solange Fátima Geraldo da Costa, Cristiani Garrido de Andrade, Regina Célia de Oliveira, Fátima Maria da Silva Abrão, Carlos Roberto Lyra da Silva

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To analyze scientific production about workplace bullying and harassment in dissertations and theses in Brazil, with emphasis on the year of publication; educational institution; area of knowledge; professional and academic background of the authors; keywords used; and concept map organization. METHOD Bibliometric study with a quantitative approach with a sample consisting of 57 papers, 5 theses and 52 dissertations, published between 2002 and 2012. RESULTS It was found that 2012 was the year with the highest number of publications in this topic area. The region that stood out was the Southeast. The institution with the highest number of publications was the Federal University of Santa Catarina. There was a predominance of dissertations and most publications were produced by researchers focused on a multidisciplinary perspective. CONCLUSION Expanding the views regarding bullying in order to disseminate scientific production was proposed, promoting further advancement of debates and raising pertinent questions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Peru 1 2%
Unknown 46 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 23%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 12 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 4 9%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 12 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,352,113
of 5,128,650 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#36
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,686
of 171,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,128,650 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 51st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.