↓ Skip to main content

Reply to 'Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making'

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Reply to 'Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making'
Published in
Nature Climate Change, May 2015
DOI 10.1038/nclimate2619
Authors

Klaus Eisenack, Susanne C. Moser, Esther Hoffmann, Richard J. T. Klein, Christoph Oberlack, Anna Pechan, Maja Rotter, Catrien J. A. M. Termeer

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 3%
Unknown 34 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 29%
Student > Master 7 20%
Researcher 7 20%
Professor 5 14%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 37%
Environmental Science 10 29%
Unspecified 6 17%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 2 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,570,686
of 7,366,802 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#1,806
of 1,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,341
of 213,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#108
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,366,802 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.