↓ Skip to main content

Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
43 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004184.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ping Zhao, Ping Xu, Chaomin Wan, Zhengrong Wang

Abstract

Variation in blood pressure levels display circadian rhythms. The morning surge in blood pressure is known to increase the risk of myocardial events in the first several hours post awakening. A systematic review of the administration-time-related-effects of evening versus morning dosing regimen of antihypertensive drugs in the management of patients with primary hypertension has not been conducted.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 193 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Other 48 24%
Unknown 47 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 56 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#751,739
of 24,460,744 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,473
of 12,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,915
of 136,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,460,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.