↓ Skip to main content

Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,297)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
2976 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2580 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget
Published in
Ecosystems, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8
Authors

J. J. Cole, Y. T. Prairie, N. F. Caraco, W. H. McDowell, L. J. Tranvik, R. G. Striegl, C. M. Duarte, P. Kortelainen, J. A. Downing, J. J. Middelburg, J. Melack

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,580 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 44 2%
Brazil 16 <1%
Canada 11 <1%
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Other 25 <1%
Unknown 2455 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 603 23%
Student > Master 438 17%
Researcher 401 16%
Student > Bachelor 218 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 166 6%
Other 338 13%
Unknown 416 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 897 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 496 19%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 403 16%
Engineering 69 3%
Chemistry 42 2%
Other 137 5%
Unknown 536 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#636,469
of 25,084,886 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#28
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,407
of 172,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,084,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.