↓ Skip to main content

Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget

Overview of attention for article published in Ecosystems, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 831)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1691 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1702 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plumbing the Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Inland Waters into the Terrestrial Carbon Budget
Published in
Ecosystems, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10021-006-9013-8
Authors

J. J. Cole, Y. T. Prairie, N. F. Caraco, W. H. McDowell, L. J. Tranvik, R. G. Striegl, C. M. Duarte, P. Kortelainen, J. A. Downing, J. J. Middelburg, J. Melack

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,702 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 45 3%
Brazil 18 1%
Canada 11 <1%
United Kingdom 11 <1%
Germany 6 <1%
Spain 6 <1%
Netherlands 4 <1%
Belgium 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Other 29 2%
Unknown 1565 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 466 27%
Student > Master 337 20%
Researcher 295 17%
Student > Bachelor 135 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 120 7%
Other 349 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 667 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 423 25%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 310 18%
Unspecified 174 10%
Engineering 41 2%
Other 87 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2019.
All research outputs
#491,427
of 13,361,190 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#36
of 831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,222
of 233,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,361,190 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.