↓ Skip to main content

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
205 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1473 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-1-23
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernadette Brennan

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a tumor arising from the epithelial cells that cover the surface and line the nasopharynx. The annual incidence of NPC in the UK is 0.3 per million at age 0-14 years, and 1 to 2 per million at age 15-19 years. Incidence is higher in the Chinese and Tunisian populations. Although rare, NPC accounts for about one third of childhood nasopharyngeal neoplasms. Three subtypes of NPC are recognized in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification: 1) squamous cell carcinoma, typically found in the older adult population; 2) non-keratinizing carcinoma; 3) undifferentiated carcinoma. The tumor can extend within or out of the nasopharynx to the other lateral wall and/or posterosuperiorly to the base of the skull or the palate, nasal cavity or oropharynx. It then typically metastases to cervical lymph nodes. Cervical lymphadenopathy is the initial presentation in many patients, and the diagnosis of NPC is often made by lymph node biopsy. Symptoms related to the primary tumor include trismus, pain, otitis media, nasal regurgitation due to paresis of the soft palate, hearing loss and cranial nerve palsies. Larger growths may produce nasal obstruction or bleeding and a "nasal twang". Etiological factors include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), genetic susceptibility and consumption of food with possible carcinogens--volatile nitrosamines. The recommended treatment schedule consists of three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, irradiation, and adjuvant interferon (IFN)-beta therapy.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,473 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 25 2%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Hong Kong 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 1441 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 695 47%
Student > Postgraduate 182 12%
Student > Master 106 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 73 5%
Other 180 12%
Unknown 142 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 504 34%
Social Sciences 272 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 129 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 125 8%
Sports and Recreations 122 8%
Other 164 11%
Unknown 157 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,409,093
of 22,653,392 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,068
of 2,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,498
of 64,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#10
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,653,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.