↓ Skip to main content

Factors impacting hunter access to private lands in southeast Minnesota

Overview of attention for article published in Human Dimensions of Wildlife, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Factors impacting hunter access to private lands in southeast Minnesota
Published in
Human Dimensions of Wildlife, December 2017
DOI 10.1080/10871209.2018.1396510
Authors

Eric Walberg, Louis Cornicelli, David C. Fulton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 50%
Other 1 13%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 50%
Unspecified 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#8,303,356
of 13,248,851 outputs
Outputs from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#145
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,098
of 268,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Dimensions of Wildlife
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,248,851 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.