You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Slow and steady wins the race? Future climate and land use change leaves the imperiled Blanding's turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) behind
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.026 |
| Authors |
Christopher M. Hamilton, Brooke L. Bateman, Jessica M. Gorzo, Brendan Reid, Wayne E. Thogmartin, M. Zachariah Peery, Patricia J. Heglund, Volker C. Radeloff, Anna M. Pidgeon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 96% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,260,151
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#1,791
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,988
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#37
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.