You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Major histocompatibility complex associations of ankylosing spondylitis are complex and involve further epistasis with ERAP1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms8146 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Cortes, Sara L. Pulit, Paul J. Leo, Jenny J. Pointon, Philip C. Robinson, Michael H. Weisman, Michael Ward, Lianne S. Gensler, Xiaodong Zhou, Henri-Jean Garchon, Gilles Chiocchia, Johannes Nossent, Benedicte A. Lie, Øystein Førre, Jaakko Tuomilehto, Kari Laiho, Linda A. Bradbury, Dirk Elewaut, Ruben Burgos-Vargas, Simon Stebbings, Louise Appleton, Claire Farrah, Jonathan Lau, Nigil Haroon, Juan Mulero, Francisco J. Blanco, Miguel A. Gonzalez-Gay, C Lopez-Larrea, Paul Bowness, Karl Gaffney, Hill Gaston, Dafna D. Gladman, Proton Rahman, Walter P. Maksymowych, J. Bart A. Crusius, Irene E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, Raphael Valle-Oñate, Consuelo Romero-Sánchez, Inger Myrnes Hansen, Fernando M. Pimentel-Santos, Robert D. Inman, Javier Martin, Maxime Breban, Bryan Paul Wordsworth, John D. Reveille, David M. Evans, Paul I.W. de Bakker, Matthew A. Brown |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Professor | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 18% |
| Unknown | 57 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 65 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,955,341
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#43,638
of 58,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,005
of 282,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#502
of 788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.