You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Blood pressure‐lowering efficacy of loop diuretics for primary hypertension
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003825.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vijaya M Musini, Pouria Rezapour, James M Wright, Ken Bassett, Ciprian D Jauca |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Japan | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Professor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 29 | 18% |
| Unknown | 47 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,094,206
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,735
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,180
of 281,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#129
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.