You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implementation of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in daily practice: the need for comprehensive education for professionals and patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Thrombosis Journal, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12959-015-0046-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hein Heidbuchel, Dana Berti, Manuel Campos, Lien Desteghe, Ana Parente Freixo, António Robalo Nunes, Vanessa Roldán, Vincenzo Toschi, Riitta Lassila |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#14,503,514
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Thrombosis Journal
#178
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,799
of 281,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thrombosis Journal
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.