You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ketogenic diets and physical performance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, August 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-1-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen D Phinney |
| Abstract |
Impaired physical performance is a common but not obligate result of a low carbohydrate diet. Lessons from traditional Inuit culture indicate that time for adaptation, optimized sodium and potassium nutriture, and constraint of protein to 15-25 % of daily energy expenditure allow unimpaired endurance performance despite nutritional ketosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 68 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 9% |
| Spain | 6 | 9% |
| South Africa | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 72% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 21% |
| Scientists | 4 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 456 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 430 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 68 | 15% |
| Other | 54 | 12% |
| Researcher | 47 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 9% |
| Other | 99 | 22% |
| Unknown | 58 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 93 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 81 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 37 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 30 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 13% |
| Unknown | 73 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 151. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#276,902
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#44
of 1,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218
of 66,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.