You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
On the Choice of Ensemble Mean for Estimating the Forced Signal in the Presence of Internal Variability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Climate, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1175/jcli-d-17-0662.1 |
| Authors |
Leela M. Frankcombe, Matthew H. England, Jules B. Kajtar, Michael E. Mann, Byron A. Steinman |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 28 | 52% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 11 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,844,914
of 23,576,969 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#1,004
of 7,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,336
of 329,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#21
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,576,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.