↓ Skip to main content

Elicitation of health state utilities associated with varying severities of flares in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elicitation of health state utilities associated with varying severities of flares in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12955-015-0262-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Pollard, S. Hartz, S. Liu Leage, M.A Paget, J. Cook, A. Enstone

Abstract

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is characterised by fluctuating periods of minimal disease activity and 'flare'. Flare is an important outcome variable impacting the disease burden associated with SLE. The objective of this study was to obtain population-based utility values for varying severities of flare to measure the impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Spain and the UK. Six health states (HS) for varying severities of flare were developed based on literature, patient blogs, and interviews with patients (n = 12), rheumatologists (n = 7) and nurses (n = 2). HS were validated by independent clinical experts (n = 6) and pilot interviews (n = 10, UK). HS were evaluated using the time-trade-off (TTO) method during face-to-face interviews with a minimum representative sample (n = 100) of the general population, per-country. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were obtained to validate TTO scores. TTO scores were converted into utility values. The highest mean TTO utility scores were observed for the anchor HS (minimal disease activity) across all countries; means ranged from 0.66 in Japan to 0.82 in UK. All flare HS were associated with a disutility compared with the anchor HS (p < 0.001), means ranged across countries: mild flare HS: 0.55-0.71, moderate flare HS: 0.38-0.53, severe renal flare HS: 0.33-0.45, severe central nervous system (CNS) flare HS: 0.30-0.45 and severe generalised flare HS: 0.19-0.33. Mean VAS scores followed the same trend. These results show increasing severity of flare has a detrimental impact on HRQoL. The severe generalised flare HS received the lowest mean utility score suggesting that the perceived day-to-day impact of a severe generalised flare was greater than a severe CNS or severe renal flare. This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first utility study to assess varying severities of flare in SLE across six different countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Postgraduate 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,349,898
of 23,907,431 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#847
of 2,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,205
of 269,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,907,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.