You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Abstracts of the MASCC/ISOO Annual Meeting 2018
|
---|---|
Published in |
Supportive Care in Cancer, April 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00520-018-4193-2 |
Pubmed ID |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 372 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 46 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 6% |
Researcher | 21 | 6% |
Other | 45 | 12% |
Unknown | 164 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 58 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 15% |
Psychology | 19 | 5% |
Computer Science | 15 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
Other | 40 | 11% |
Unknown | 173 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2018.
All research outputs
#5,816,262
of 23,047,237 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#1,360
of 4,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,702
of 326,560 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#54
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,047,237 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,560 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.