↓ Skip to main content

Alternating current cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
85 tweeters
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alternating current cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2014
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd010521.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harish C Kavirajan, Kristin Lueck, Kenneth Chuang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 127 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 28%
Psychology 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 35 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2019.
All research outputs
#310,072
of 17,407,080 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#667
of 11,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,849
of 241,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#17
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,407,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.