↓ Skip to main content

Hepatitis B Vaccines and HPV Vaccines Have Been Hailed as Major Public Health Achievements in Preventing Cancer—Could a Schistosomiasis Vaccine be the Third?

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatitis B Vaccines and HPV Vaccines Have Been Hailed as Major Public Health Achievements in Preventing Cancer—Could a Schistosomiasis Vaccine be the Third?
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, May 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003598
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael H. Hsieh, Julia M. L. Brotherton, Afzal A. Siddiqui

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 36%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 27%
Engineering 2 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Chemistry 1 9%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2015.
All research outputs
#839,915
of 11,347,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#931
of 5,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,059
of 227,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#34
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,347,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.