| Title |
Sepsis is a preventable public health problem
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-018-2048-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan A. Kempker, Henry E. Wang, Greg S. Martin |
| Abstract |
There is a paradigm shift happening for sepsis. Sepsis is no longer solely conceptualized as problem of individual patients treated in emergency departments and intensive care units but also as one that is addressed as public health issue with population- and systems-based solutions. We offer a conceptual framework for sepsis as a public health problem by adapting the traditional model of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 23 | 11% |
| Spain | 16 | 8% |
| Mexico | 11 | 5% |
| Argentina | 9 | 4% |
| Chile | 7 | 3% |
| Colombia | 6 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 5 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 12% |
| Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 35 | 17% |
| Scientists | 21 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 75 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 28 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2020.
All research outputs
#335,443
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#171
of 6,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,473
of 342,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.