You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Integration of Family-Based Treatment and Dialectical Behavior Therapy for Adolescent Bulimia Nervosa: Philosophical and Practical Considerations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Eating Disorders: Theory, Research and Practice, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10640266.2015.1042319 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leslie K. Anderson, Stuart B. Murray, Ana L. Ramirez, Roxanne Rockwell, Daniel Le Grange, Walter H. Kaye |
| Abstract |
Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) and family-based treatment (FBT) are two evidence-based interventions that have been applied in the treatment of bulimia nervosa (BN) in adolescents. While DBT focuses on providing skills for coping with emotion dysregulation that often co-occurs with BN, FBT targets the normalization of eating patterns. The purpose of the current article is to introduce an integration of both treatments to provide a more comprehensive approach that targets the full scope of the disorder. We provide a review of the conceptual similarities and differences between FBT-BN and DBT along with strategies to guide a blended treatment approach. Given the strengths and limitations of either independent treatment, DBT and FBT-BN complement one another and together can address the range of symptoms and behaviors typically seen in adolescent BN. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 40 | 38% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,529
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Eating Disorders: Theory, Research and Practice
#437
of 631 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,181
of 280,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Eating Disorders: Theory, Research and Practice
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 631 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.