↓ Skip to main content

Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
342 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrated Personal Health Records: Transformative Tools for Consumer-Centric Care
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2008
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-8-45
Pubmed ID
Authors

Don Detmer, Meryl Bloomrosen, Brian Raymond, Paul Tang

Abstract

Integrated personal health records (PHRs) offer significant potential to stimulate transformational changes in health care delivery and self-care by patients. In 2006, an invitational roundtable sponsored by Kaiser Permanente Institute, the American Medical Informatics Association, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality was held to identify the transformative potential of PHRs, as well as barriers to realizing this potential and a framework for action to move them closer to the health care mainstream. This paper highlights and builds on the insights shared during the roundtable.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 7%
United Kingdom 6 2%
Canada 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 293 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 94 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 75 22%
Researcher 44 13%
Student > Bachelor 21 6%
Other 16 5%
Other 67 20%
Unknown 25 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 99 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 79 23%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 33 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 6%
Other 42 12%
Unknown 31 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2016.
All research outputs
#1,057,328
of 12,409,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#92
of 1,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,727
of 103,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,409,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.