↓ Skip to main content

Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non‐patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient controlled opioid analgesia versus non‐patient controlled opioid analgesia for postoperative pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003348.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ewan D McNicol, McKenzie C Ferguson, Jana Hudcova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 433 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 11%
Student > Bachelor 48 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 10%
Other 41 9%
Researcher 35 8%
Other 97 22%
Unknown 125 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 5%
Psychology 17 4%
Social Sciences 8 2%
Other 36 8%
Unknown 137 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,996,386
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,624
of 11,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,976
of 282,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#122
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.