↓ Skip to main content

GPS tracking for mapping seabird mortality induced by light pollution

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
61 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
GPS tracking for mapping seabird mortality induced by light pollution
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep10670
Pubmed ID
Authors

Airam Rodríguez, Beneharo Rodríguez, Juan J. Negro

Abstract

Light pollution and its consequences on ecosystems are increasing worldwide. Knowledge on the threshold levels of light pollution at which significant ecological impacts emerge and the size of dark refuges to maintain natural nocturnal processes is crucial to mitigate its negative consequences. Seabird fledglings are attracted by artificial lights when they leave their nest at night, causing high mortality. We used GPS data-loggers to track the flights of Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea fledglings from nest-burrows to ground, and to evaluate the light pollution levels of overflown areas on Tenerife, Canary Islands, using nocturnal, high-resolution satellite imagery. Birds were grounded at locations closer than 16 km from colonies in their maiden flights, and 50% were rescued within a 3 km radius from the nest-site. Most birds left the nests in the first three hours after sunset. Rescue locations showed radiance values greater than colonies, and flight distance was positively related to light pollution levels. Breeding habitat alteration by light pollution was more severe for inland colonies. We provide scientific-based information to manage dark refuges facilitating that fledglings from inland colonies reach the sea successfully. We also offer methodological approaches useful for other critically threatened petrel species grounded by light pollution.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 19%
Researcher 23 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 18%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Other 14 12%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 46%
Environmental Science 29 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 6%
Physics and Astronomy 6 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 12 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#327,066
of 14,070,415 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,927
of 71,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,695
of 235,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#178
of 3,834 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,070,415 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,834 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.