↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in An Outpatient Setting

Overview of attention for article published in General Psychiatry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of Misdiagnosis of Bipolar Disorder in An Outpatient Setting
Published in
General Psychiatry, July 2018
DOI 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Shen, Li Zhang, Chuchen Xu, Jinling Zhu, Meijuan Chen, Yiru Fang

Abstract

Bipolar disorder is a mental illness with a high misdiagnosis rate and commonly misdiagnosed as other mental disorders including depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorders, and personality disorders, resulting in the mistreatment of clinical symptoms and increasing of recurrent episodes. To understand the reasons for misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder in an outpatient setting in order to help clinicians more clearly identify the disease and avoid diagnostic errors. Data from an outpatient clinic included two groups: those with a confirmed diagnosis of bipolar disorder (CD group) and those who were misdiagnosed (i.e. those who did in fact have bipolar disorder but received a different diagnoses and those without bipolar disorder who received a bipolar diagnosis [MD group]). Information between these two groups was compared. There were a total of 177 cases that met the inclusion criteria for this study. Among them, 136 cases (76.8%) were in the MD group and 41 cases (23.2%) were in the CD group. Patents with depression had the most cases of misdiagnosis (70.6%). The first episode of the patients in the MD group was more likely to be a depressive episode (χ2=5.206, p=0.023) and these patients had a greater number of depressive episodes during the course of the disease (Z=-2.268, p=0.023); the time from the onset of the disease to the first treatment was comparatively short (Z=-2.612, p=0.009) in the group with misdiagnosis; the time from the onset of disease to a confirmed diagnosis was longer (Z=-3.685, p<0.001); the overall course of disease was longer (Z=-3.274, p=0.001); there were more inpatients for treatment (χ2=4.539, p=0.033); and hospitalization was more frequent (Z=-2.164, p=0.031). The group with misdiagnosis had more psychotic symptoms (χ2=11.74, p= 0.001); particularly when depression occurred (χ2=7.63, p= 0.006), and the incidence of comorbidity was higher (χ2=5.23, p=0.022). The HCL-32 rating was lower in the misdiagnosis group (t=-2.564, p=0.011). There were more patients diagnosed with bipolar and other related disorders in the misdiagnosis group than in the confirmed diagnosis group (11.0% v. 4.9%) and there were more patients in the MD group diagnosed with depressive episodes who had a recent episode (78.7% v. 65.9%). The rate of misdiagnosis of patients with bipolar receiving outpatient treatment was quite high and they often received a misdiagnosis of depression. In the misdiagnosis group the first episode tended to manifest as a depressive episode. In this group there were also a greater number of depressive episodes over the course of illness, accompanied by more psychotic symptoms and a higher incidence of comorbidity. Moreover, these patients apparently lacked insight into their own mania and hypomania symptoms, resulting in difficulties in early diagnosis, longer time needed to confirm the diagnosis, higher rate of hospitalization, and greater number of hospitalizations.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 147 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 18%
Student > Master 22 15%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 55 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 62 42%