↓ Skip to main content

Edge effects in game-theoretic dynamics of spatially structured tumours

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of The Royal Society Interface, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
21 X users

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Edge effects in game-theoretic dynamics of spatially structured tumours
Published in
Journal of The Royal Society Interface, July 2015
DOI 10.1098/rsif.2015.0154
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artem Kaznatcheev, Jacob G. Scott, David Basanta

Abstract

Cancer dynamics are an evolutionary game between cellular phenotypes. A typical assumption in this modelling paradigm is that the probability of a given phenotypic strategy interacting with another depends exclusively on the abundance of those strategies without regard for local neighbourhood structure. We address this limitation by using the Ohtsuki-Nowak transform to introduce spatial structure to the go versus grow game. We show that spatial structure can promote the invasive (go) strategy. By considering the change in neighbourhood size at a static boundary-such as a blood vessel, organ capsule or basement membrane-we show an edge effect that allows a tumour without invasive phenotypes in the bulk to have a polyclonal boundary with invasive cells. We present an example of this promotion of invasive (epithelial-mesenchymal transition-positive) cells in a metastatic colony of prostate adenocarcinoma in bone marrow. Our results caution that pathologic analyses that do not distinguish between cells in the bulk and cells at a static edge of a tumour can underestimate the number of invasive cells. Although we concentrate on applications in mathematical oncology, we expect our approach to extend to other evolutionary game models where interaction neighbourhoods change at fixed system boundaries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 7%
Spain 2 3%
France 2 3%
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 19%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Student > Master 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 19%
Mathematics 9 15%
Physics and Astronomy 5 8%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#1,197,265
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#557
of 3,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,247
of 276,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of The Royal Society Interface
#11
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.