You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ancient hepatitis B viruses from the Bronze Age to the Medieval period
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-018-0097-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| URN |
urn:nbn:se:su:diva-157746
|
| Authors |
Barbara Mühlemann, Terry C. Jones, Peter de Barros Damgaard, Morten E. Allentoft, Irina Shevnina, Andrey Logvin, Emma Usmanova, Irina P. Panyushkina, Bazartseren Boldgiv, Tsevel Bazartseren, Kadicha Tashbaeva, Victor Merz, Nina Lau, Václav Smrčka, Dmitry Voyakin, Egor Kitov, Andrey Epimakhov, Dalia Pokutta, Magdolna Vicze, T. Douglas Price, Vyacheslav Moiseyev, Anders J. Hansen, Ludovic Orlando, Simon Rasmussen, Martin Sikora, Lasse Vinner, Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus, Derek J. Smith, Dieter Glebe, Ron A. M. Fouchier, Christian Drosten, Karl-Göran Sjögren, Kristian Kristiansen, Eske Willerslev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 177 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 21 | 12% |
| Germany | 7 | 4% |
| France | 5 | 3% |
| Denmark | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Unknown | 73 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 101 | 57% |
| Scientists | 64 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 274 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 21% |
| Researcher | 48 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 47 | 17% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 61 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 11% |
| Unknown | 79 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 535. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#47,148
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#3,937
of 98,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,046
of 342,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#94
of 889 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,701 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 889 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.