The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Gut Microbiota of Marine Fish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Microbiology, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00873 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sian Egerton, Sarah Culloty, Jason Whooley, Catherine Stanton, R. Paul Ross |
| Abstract |
The body of work relating to the gut microbiota of fish is dwarfed by that on humans and mammals. However, it is a field that has had historical interest and has grown significantly along with the expansion of the aquaculture industry and developments in microbiome research. Research is now moving quickly in this field. Much recent focus has been on nutritional manipulation and modification of the gut microbiota to meet the needs of fish farming, while trying to maintain host health and welfare. However, the diversity amongst fish means that baseline data from wild fish and a clear understanding of the role that specific gut microbiota play is still lacking. We review here the factors shaping marine fish gut microbiota and highlight gaps in the research. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 7 | 8% |
| Brazil | 5 | 6% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Fiji | 1 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 52 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 72 | 85% |
| Scientists | 10 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 860 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 860 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 133 | 15% |
| Researcher | 124 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 119 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 92 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 42 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 12% |
| Unknown | 246 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 267 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 111 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 59 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 38 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 30 | 3% |
| Other | 67 | 8% |
| Unknown | 288 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2021.
All research outputs
#815,165
of 26,527,568 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Microbiology
#449
of 30,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,160
of 344,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Microbiology
#11
of 602 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,527,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 602 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.