You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd004945.pub4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Philippa Middleton, Emily Shepherd, Caroline A Crowther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
| Spain | 4 | 14% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 799 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 797 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 117 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 13% |
| Researcher | 82 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 59 | 7% |
| Other | 147 | 18% |
| Unknown | 229 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 265 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 128 | 16% |
| Psychology | 26 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 2% |
| Other | 75 | 9% |
| Unknown | 263 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#297,719
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#497
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,563
of 342,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#18
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.