↓ Skip to main content

Linking resource selection and mortality modeling for population estimation of mountain lions in Montana

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Modelling, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking resource selection and mortality modeling for population estimation of mountain lions in Montana
Published in
Ecological Modelling, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.013
Authors

Hugh S. Robinson, Toni Ruth, Justin A. Gude, David Choate, Rich DeSimone, Mark Hebblewhite, Kyran Kunkel, Marc R. Matchett, Michael S. Mitchell, Kerry Murphy, Jim Williams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 26%
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 19%
Unspecified 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 68%
Environmental Science 18 23%
Unspecified 7 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,059,551
of 12,277,771 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#143
of 1,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,160
of 235,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,277,771 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,266 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.