You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Linking resource selection and mortality modeling for population estimation of mountain lions in Montana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Modelling, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.05.013 |
| Authors |
Hugh S. Robinson, Toni Ruth, Justin A. Gude, David Choate, Rich DeSimone, Mark Hebblewhite, Kyran Kunkel, Marc R. Matchett, Michael S. Mitchell, Kerry Murphy, Jim Williams |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 33% |
| Mongolia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 113 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,332,572
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#518
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,906
of 276,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#7
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.