↓ Skip to main content

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 40,425)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
475 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Published in
Science, June 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa5632
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas R. Karl, Anthony Arguez, Boyin Huang, Jay H. Lawrimore, James R. McMahon, Matthew J. Menne, Thomas C. Peterson, Russell S. Vose, Huai-Min Zhang

Abstract

Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming "hiatus." Here we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than reported by the IPCC, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a "slowdown" in the increase of global surface temperature.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 505 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 5%
Germany 5 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 4 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Other 17 4%
Unknown 411 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 143 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 27%
Student > Master 60 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Professor 25 5%
Other 88 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 195 41%
Environmental Science 104 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 15%
Engineering 22 5%
Chemistry 16 3%
Other 67 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2336. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2017.
All research outputs
#177
of 7,928,563 outputs
Outputs from Science
#14
of 40,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 219,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 766 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,928,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 40,425 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 766 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.