↓ Skip to main content

Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 54,536)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
596 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus
Published in
Science, June 2015
DOI 10.1126/science.aaa5632
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. R. Karl, A. Arguez, B. Huang, J. H. Lawrimore, J. R. McMahon, M. J. Menne, T. C. Peterson, R. S. Vose, H.-M. Zhang

Abstract

Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming "hiatus." Here we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than reported by the IPCC, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a "slowdown" in the increase of global surface temperature.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 517 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 596 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 4%
Germany 6 1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
China 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Norway 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Other 21 4%
Unknown 525 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 170 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 152 26%
Student > Master 68 11%
Student > Bachelor 42 7%
Professor 31 5%
Other 133 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 216 36%
Environmental Science 122 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 14%
Unspecified 46 8%
Engineering 26 4%
Other 104 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2317. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2018.
All research outputs
#384
of 12,146,628 outputs
Outputs from Science
#30
of 54,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8
of 232,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#1
of 743 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,146,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 54,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 743 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.