↓ Skip to main content

Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines

Overview of attention for article published in Science, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
426 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
802 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines
Published in
Science, May 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aar1965
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon J O'Hanlon, Adrien Rieux, Rhys A Farrer, Gonçalo M Rosa, Bruce Waldman, Arnaud Bataille, Tiffany A Kosch, Kris A Murray, Balázs Brankovics, Matteo Fumagalli, Michael D Martin, Nathan Wales, Mario Alvarado-Rybak, Kieran A Bates, Lee Berger, Susanne Böll, Lola Brookes, Frances Clare, Elodie A Courtois, Andrew A Cunningham, Thomas M Doherty-Bone, Pria Ghosh, David J Gower, William E Hintz, Jacob Höglund, Thomas S Jenkinson, Chun-Fu Lin, Anssi Laurila, Adeline Loyau, An Martel, Sara Meurling, Claude Miaud, Pete Minting, Frank Pasmans, Dirk S Schmeller, Benedikt R Schmidt, Jennifer M G Shelton, Lee F Skerratt, Freya Smith, Claudio Soto-Azat, Matteo Spagnoletti, Giulia Tessa, Luís Felipe Toledo, Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez, Ruhan Verster, Judit Vörös, Rebecca J Webb, Claudia Wierzbicki, Emma Wombwell, Kelly R Zamudio, David M Aanensen, Timothy Y James, M Thomas P Gilbert, Ché Weldon, Jaime Bosch, François Balloux, Trenton W J Garner, Matthew C Fisher

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 899 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 802 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 802 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 144 18%
Student > Master 118 15%
Researcher 113 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 13%
Other 29 4%
Other 105 13%
Unknown 186 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 317 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 93 12%
Environmental Science 91 11%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 29 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 2%
Other 48 6%
Unknown 211 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1553. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,413
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Science
#404
of 83,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117
of 339,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#12
of 1,220 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,220 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.