↓ Skip to main content

Alterations in DNA Methylation May Be the Key to Early Detection and Treatment of Schistosomal Bladder Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alterations in DNA Methylation May Be the Key to Early Detection and Treatment of Schistosomal Bladder Cancer
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, June 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003696
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon L. Conti, Jared Honeycutt, Justin I. Odegaard, Mark L. Gonzalgo, Michael H. Hsieh

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 22 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 30%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Librarian 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Other 5 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#2,812,402
of 11,271,704 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#2,276
of 5,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,794
of 227,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#86
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,271,704 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,876 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.