↓ Skip to main content

Psychostimulants for depression

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychostimulants for depression
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006722.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget Candy, Louise Jones, Rachael Williams, Adrian Tookman, Michael King

Abstract

Depression is common, disabling, costly and under-treated. There are problems in the current first-line drug treatment, antidepressants, for moderate or severe depression. There is a body of research that has evaluated the effect of psychostimulants (PS) in the treatment of depression. This has not been reviewed systematically.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 2 2%
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Unknown 109 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 38%
Psychology 10 9%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 28 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2018.
All research outputs
#875,295
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,588
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,001
of 104,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#16
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.