Title |
Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2008.1142 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Robert E Gill, T. Lee Tibbitts, David C Douglas, Colleen M Handel, Daniel M Mulcahy, Jon C Gottschalck, Nils Warnock, Brian J McCaffery, Philip F Battley, Theunis Piersma |
Abstract |
Mountain ranges, deserts, ice fields and oceans generally act as barriers to the movement of land-dependent animals, often profoundly shaping migration routes. We used satellite telemetry to track the southward flights of bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica baueri), shorebirds whose breeding and non-breeding areas are separated by the vast central Pacific Ocean. Seven females with surgically implanted transmitters flew non-stop 8,117-11,680 km (10153+/-1043 s.d.) directly across the Pacific Ocean; two males with external transmitters flew non-stop along the same corridor for 7,008-7,390 km. Flight duration ranged from 6.0 to 9.4 days (7.8+/-1.3 s.d.) for birds with implants and 5.0 to 6.6 days for birds with externally attached transmitters. These extraordinary non-stop flights establish new extremes for avian flight performance, have profound implications for understanding the physiological capabilities of vertebrates and how birds navigate, and challenge current physiological paradigms on topics such as sleep, dehydration and phenotypic flexibility. Predicted changes in climatic systems may affect survival rates if weather conditions at their departure hub or along the migration corridor should change. We propose that this transoceanic route may function as an ecological corridor rather than a barrier, providing a wind-assisted passage relatively free of pathogens and predators. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 26 | 32% |
Australia | 7 | 9% |
New Zealand | 6 | 7% |
Canada | 3 | 4% |
Netherlands | 3 | 4% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Latvia | 1 | 1% |
Japan | 1 | 1% |
Ireland | 1 | 1% |
Other | 3 | 4% |
Unknown | 29 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 73 | 89% |
Scientists | 7 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
Mexico | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Sweden | 2 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Other | 7 | 1% |
Unknown | 483 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 100 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 19% |
Student > Master | 78 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 42 | 8% |
Other | 32 | 6% |
Other | 64 | 12% |
Unknown | 102 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 272 | 53% |
Environmental Science | 72 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 3% |
Engineering | 12 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 6 | 1% |
Other | 34 | 7% |
Unknown | 108 | 21% |