↓ Skip to main content

Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier?

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
82 X users
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
139 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
517 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extreme endurance flights by landbirds crossing the Pacific Ocean: ecological corridor rather than barrier?
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, October 2008
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2008.1142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert E Gill, T. Lee Tibbitts, David C Douglas, Colleen M Handel, Daniel M Mulcahy, Jon C Gottschalck, Nils Warnock, Brian J McCaffery, Philip F Battley, Theunis Piersma

Abstract

Mountain ranges, deserts, ice fields and oceans generally act as barriers to the movement of land-dependent animals, often profoundly shaping migration routes. We used satellite telemetry to track the southward flights of bar-tailed godwits (Limosa lapponica baueri), shorebirds whose breeding and non-breeding areas are separated by the vast central Pacific Ocean. Seven females with surgically implanted transmitters flew non-stop 8,117-11,680 km (10153+/-1043 s.d.) directly across the Pacific Ocean; two males with external transmitters flew non-stop along the same corridor for 7,008-7,390 km. Flight duration ranged from 6.0 to 9.4 days (7.8+/-1.3 s.d.) for birds with implants and 5.0 to 6.6 days for birds with externally attached transmitters. These extraordinary non-stop flights establish new extremes for avian flight performance, have profound implications for understanding the physiological capabilities of vertebrates and how birds navigate, and challenge current physiological paradigms on topics such as sleep, dehydration and phenotypic flexibility. Predicted changes in climatic systems may affect survival rates if weather conditions at their departure hub or along the migration corridor should change. We propose that this transoceanic route may function as an ecological corridor rather than a barrier, providing a wind-assisted passage relatively free of pathogens and predators.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 517 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 2%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 1%
Unknown 483 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 100 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 99 19%
Student > Master 78 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 8%
Other 32 6%
Other 64 12%
Unknown 102 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 272 53%
Environmental Science 72 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 3%
Engineering 12 2%
Physics and Astronomy 6 1%
Other 34 7%
Unknown 108 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 342. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2024.
All research outputs
#103,186
of 26,717,531 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#216
of 11,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184
of 107,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,717,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,743 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.