↓ Skip to main content

Predator control promotes invasive dominated ecological states

Overview of attention for article published in Ecology Letters, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
147 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
348 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predator control promotes invasive dominated ecological states
Published in
Ecology Letters, June 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01492.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arian D. Wallach, Christopher N. Johnson, Euan G. Ritchie, Adam J. O’Neill

Abstract

Invasive species are regarded as one of the top five drivers of the global extinction crisis. In response, extreme measures have been applied in an attempt to control or eradicate invasives, with little success overall. We tested the idea that state shifts to invasive dominance are symptomatic of losses in ecosystem resilience, due to the suppression of apex predators. This concept was investigated in Australia where the high rate of mammalian extinctions is largely attributed to the destructive influence of invasive species. Intensive pest control is widely applied across the continent, simultaneously eliminating Australia's apex predator, the dingo (Canis lupus dingo). We show that predator management accounts for shifts between two main ecosystem states. Lethal control fractures dingo social structure and leads to bottom-up driven increases in invasive mesopredators and herbivores. Where control is relaxed, dingoes re-establish top-down regulation of ecosystems, allowing for the recovery of biodiversity and productivity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Australia 6 2%
Canada 4 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Sweden 3 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 315 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 79 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 19%
Student > Master 42 12%
Student > Bachelor 42 12%
Other 15 4%
Other 55 16%
Unknown 50 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 177 51%
Environmental Science 80 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 3%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 <1%
Other 14 4%
Unknown 59 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#398,786
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from Ecology Letters
#179
of 3,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,003
of 100,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecology Letters
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,838 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.