↓ Skip to main content

Accommodating Dynamic Oceanographic Processes and Pelagic Biodiversity in Marine Conservation Planning

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Accommodating Dynamic Oceanographic Processes and Pelagic Biodiversity in Marine Conservation Planning
Published in
PLoS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hedley S. Grantham, Edward T. Game, Amanda T. Lombard, Alistair J. Hobday, Anthony J. Richardson, Lynnath E. Beckley, Robert L. Pressey, Jenny A. Huggett, Janet C. Coetzee, Carl D. van der Lingen, Samantha L. Petersen, Dagmar Merkle, Hugh P. Possingham

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 1%
Canada 3 1%
Mexico 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Jersey 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 5 2%
Unknown 186 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 69 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 14%
Other 30 14%
Student > Master 25 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 42 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 50%
Environmental Science 67 32%
Unspecified 16 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 11 5%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 7 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2016.
All research outputs
#2,085,775
of 12,185,171 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#31,853
of 133,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,398
of 233,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#1,456
of 6,429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,185,171 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 133,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6,429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.