Title |
Challenging Traditional Premedical Requirements as Predictors of Success in Medical School: The Mount Sinai School of Medicine Humanities and Medicine Program
|
---|---|
Published in |
Academic medicine, August 2010
|
DOI | 10.1097/acm.0b013e3181dbf22a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Muller, Nathan Kase |
Abstract |
Students compete aggressively as they prepare for the MCAT and fulfill traditional premedical requirements that have uncertain educational value for medical and scientific careers and limit the scope of their liberal arts and biomedical education. This study assessed the medical school performance of humanities and social science majors who omitted organic chemistry, physics, and calculus, and did not take the MCAT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Thailand | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 92 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
Other | 10 | 10% |
Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
Other | 30 | 31% |
Unknown | 12 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 39% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 7% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 13 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 72. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#606,648
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#181
of 6,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,516
of 104,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#2
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.