↓ Skip to main content

Hyperacute directional hearing in a microscale auditory system

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
189 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperacute directional hearing in a microscale auditory system
Published in
Nature, April 2001
DOI 10.1038/35070564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew C. Mason, Michael L. Oshinsky, Ron R. Hoy

Abstract

The physics of sound propagation imposes fundamental constraints on sound localization: for a given frequency, the smaller the receiver, the smaller the available cues. Thus, the creation of nanoscale acoustic microphones with directional sensitivity is very difficult. The fly Ormia ochracea possesses an unusual 'ear' that largely overcomes these physical constraints; attempts to exploit principles derived from O. ochracea for improved hearing aids are now in progress. Here we report that O. ochracea can behaviourally localize a salient sound source with a precision equal to that of humans. Despite its small size and minuscule interaural cues, the fly localizes sound sources to within 2 degrees azimuth. As the fly's eardrums are less than 0.5 mm apart, localization cues are around 50 ns. Directional information is represented in the auditory system by the relative timing of receptor responses in the two ears. Low-jitter, phasic receptor responses are pooled to achieve hyperacute timecoding. These results demonstrate that nanoscale/microscale directional microphones patterned after O. ochracea have the potential for highly accurate directional sensitivity, independent of their size. Notably, in the fly itself this performance is dependent on a newly discovered set of specific coding strategies employed by the nervous system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
United States 4 2%
Canada 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 161 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 18%
Researcher 30 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Master 22 13%
Professor 13 7%
Other 34 19%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 44%
Engineering 20 11%
Psychology 12 7%
Neuroscience 11 6%
Physics and Astronomy 7 4%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 26 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#580,352
of 22,808,725 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#24,049
of 90,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#332
of 40,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#19
of 402 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,808,725 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 402 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.