↓ Skip to main content

Pore fluid pressure, apparent friction, and Coulomb failure

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geophysical Research, November 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pore fluid pressure, apparent friction, and Coulomb failure
Published in
Journal of Geophysical Research, November 2000
DOI 10.1029/2000jb900119
Authors

N. M. Beeler, R. W. Simpson, S. H. Hickman, D. A. Lockner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
El Salvador 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 92 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 36%
Researcher 26 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 4 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 77 77%
Engineering 9 9%
Computer Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Unknown 12 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,680,064
of 13,990,270 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geophysical Research
#2,142
of 8,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,647
of 235,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geophysical Research
#12
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,990,270 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.