↓ Skip to main content

Diviner Lunar Radiometer Observations of Cold Traps in the Moon's South Polar Region

Overview of attention for article published in Science, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Diviner Lunar Radiometer Observations of Cold Traps in the Moon's South Polar Region
Published in
Science, October 2010
DOI 10.1126/science.1187726
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. A. Paige, M. A. Siegler, J. A. Zhang, P. O. Hayne, E. J. Foote, K. A. Bennett, A. R. Vasavada, B. T. Greenhagen, J. T. Schofield, D. J. McCleese, M. C. Foote, E. DeJong, B. G. Bills, W. Hartford, B. C. Murray, C. C. Allen, K. Snook, L. A. Soderblom, S. Calcutt, F. W. Taylor, N. E. Bowles, J. L. Bandfield, R. Elphic, R. Ghent, T. D. Glotch, M. B. Wyatt, P. G. Lucey

Abstract

Diviner Lunar Radiometer Experiment surface-temperature maps reveal the existence of widespread surface and near-surface cryogenic regions that extend beyond the boundaries of persistent shadow. The Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS) struck one of the coldest of these regions, where subsurface temperatures are estimated to be 38 kelvin. Large areas of the lunar polar regions are currently cold enough to cold-trap water ice as well as a range of both more volatile and less volatile species. The diverse mixture of water and high-volatility compounds detected in the LCROSS ejecta plume is strong evidence for the impact delivery and cold-trapping of volatiles derived from primitive outer solar system bodies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Canada 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Japan 2 2%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 95 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 23%
Student > Master 15 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 10%
Other 4 4%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 6 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 33%
Physics and Astronomy 31 29%
Engineering 22 20%
Chemistry 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 10 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#667,325
of 13,968,403 outputs
Outputs from Science
#15,668
of 63,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,371
of 108,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#196
of 771 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,968,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 63,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,903 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 771 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.