You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Phenotypic suppression and misreading in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, January 1979
|
DOI | 10.1038/277146a0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
ARJUN SINGH, DORIS URSIC, JULIAN DAVIES |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Professor | 4 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 17% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 23% |
Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2006.
All research outputs
#4,763,732
of 23,049,027 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,883
of 91,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,435
of 26,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#20
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,049,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,424 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 26,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.